Carmen Festejo v. Isaias Fernando [G.r. no. L-5156 march 11, 1954]
FACTS: The defendant, as Director of the
Bureau of Public Works, without authority obtained first from the Court of
First Instance of Ilocos Sur, without obtaining first a right of way, and
without the consent and knowledge of the plaintiff, and against her express
objection unlawfully took possession of portions of the three parcels of land
and caused an irrigation canal to be constructed on the portion of the three
parcels of land on to the damage and prejudice of the plaintiff.
ISSUE: Whether or not this is a suit
against the state?
RULING: No, the evidence and conceded facts
in finding that in the trespass on plaintiff's land defendant committed acts outside
the scope of his authority. When he went outside the boundaries of the right of
way upon plaintiff's land and damaged it or destroyed its former condition and
usefulness, he must be held to have designedly departed from the duties imposed
on him by law.
Ordinarily the officer or employee
committing the tort is personally liable therefore, and may be sued as any
other citizen and held answerable for whatever injury or damage results from
his tortuous act. It is a general rule that an officer-executive,
administrative quasi-judicial, ministerial, or otherwise who acts outside the
scope of his jurisdiction and without authorization of law may thereby render
himself amenable to personal liability in a civil suit. If he exceed the power
conferred on him by law, he cannot shelter himself by the plea that he is a
public agent acting under the color of his office, and not personally. In the
eye of the law, his acts then are wholly without authority.
ART. 32. Any public officer or employee,
or any private individual, who directly or indirectly obstructs, defeats, violates
or in any manner impedes or impairs any of the following rights and liberties
of another person shall be liable to the latter for damages: (6) The right
against deprivation of property without due process of law;
Separate Opinions CONCEPCION, J.,
dissenting:
To my mind, the allegations of the
complaint lead to no other conclusion than that appellee Isaias Fernando is a
party in this case, not in his personal capacity, but as an officer of the
Government. According to said pleading the defendant is "Isaias Fernando,
Director, Bureau of Public Works." Moreover, in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the
complaint, it is alleged: 4. That the defendant as Director of the Bureau of
Public Works, is in charge of irrigation projects and systems, and the
official responsible for the construction of irrigation system in the
Philippines;
We take judicial notice of the fact
that the irrigation projects and system reffered to in the complaint — of which
the defendant, Isaias Fernando, according to the same pleading, is "in
charge" and for which he is "responsible" as Director of the
Bureau of Public Works — are established and operated with public funds, which
pursuant to the Constitution, must be appropriated by law. Irrespective of the
manner in which the construction may have been undertaken by the Bureau of
Public Works, the system or canal is, therefore, a property of the Government.
Comments
Post a Comment