Asiatec vs. A. Llanes
ASIATIC PETROLEUM CO. (P.I.), LTD., plaintiff-appellee, vs.A. LLANES, provincial treasurer of Cebu, defendant-appellant G.R. No. L-25386 October 20, 1926
FACTS:
Asiatec Petroleum appealed at the
Supreme Court against Llanes for the purpose of recovering the sum of P3,523.02 from the Provincial
Treasurers of Cebu. Way back August 22,
1919 plaintiff and the defendants made a contract of lease of the Shell Island.
The said island owned by Asiatec Petroleum Co. whereby Government leased to
said company for the term of fifty years a piece of land, having an area of one
and one-half hectares, situated adjacent to the Island of Mactam, municipality
of Opon, Province of Cebu. The plaintiff made some improvements At the time of
the making of the lease, the land referred to was accustomed to be covered by
water at high tide; but it was needed by the lessee as a site for tanks to be
used in the storage of petroleum. In order to reclaim the site and protect the
improvements thereon from the sea, it was necessary for the company to build a
concrete and cement foundation, protected by retaining walls of the same
material. Under section 344 of the Administrative Code especially exempts from
local taxation property owned by the United States of America or by the
Government of the Philippine Islands. On the other hand Act No. 2874; and in
section 113 of this Act there is a general provision that all the lands granted
by virtue of said Act, except homesteads, shall be subject to the ordinary
taxes which shall be paid by the grantee even though the title remains in the
Government.
ISSUE:
Whether or not the law Act No. 2874 section 113 which provides all the lands granted by
virtue of said Act, except homesteads, shall be subject to the ordinary taxes
which shall be paid by the grantee even though the title remains in the
Government. be given a retroactive effect.
Ruling:
Street,
J.:
Court
decide that the Lessee is not taxable in respect to the land which is the
subject of the lease, it is subject to taxation with respect to the
improvements. The appealed judgment must therefore be modified by reducing the
recovery to the amount paid upon the land, namely, P2,270.88; and this refund
must, under section 1579 of the Administrative Code, be made without interest.
It
being understood that the recovery is limited to the amount last above stated,
without interest, the same is affirmed, without costs.
AVANCEÑA,
C. J.
Act
No. 1654 which, in making inapplicable, in leases of reclaimed seashore land,
the exemption in favor of the Government from taxation, has made reference not
only to, the land but also to the improvements thereon. If these improvements
made by the lessee were to be considered the property of the lessee during the
lease, the law would not have referred to them inasmuch seven without this
reference said improvements would be subject to taxation. It is my opinion that
the Government, being the owner of the land on which the improvements were
made, upon which taxes are sought to be levied, and as these improvements have
been by the plaintiff, as lessee, without the right to remove them, they must
be held to be Government property and are also exempt from taxation.
Comments
Post a Comment