GLOBE MACKAY VS TOBIAS
MANSION BISCUIT CORPORATION, represented by its president, ANG CHO HONG, petitioner, vs.COURT OF APPEALS, TY TECK SUAN substituted by his heirs, ROSENDA TY, ELIZABETH TY KOH, EDWARD TY, EDMUND TY, EDGAR TY, EVELYN T. LIM, EDWIN TY and EDISON TY, and SIY GUI,respondents. G.R.
No. 81262 176 SCRA 778AUGUST 25, 1989
FACTS:
In year 1972 GlobeMackay discovered fictitious purchases and other
fraudulent transactions for which it lost several thousands of pesos. Herbert
C. Hendry who was the Executive President alleged Mr. Restituto M. Torbias as a
number one suspect of the said anomalies since, the latter actually made the
report regarding the hot issues in the company. And the petitioner filed 5cases
against the respondent which 4 of those were estafa through falsification of
commercial documents and 5th was for violation Art. 290 of the Revised Penal Code(Discovering
Secrets Through Seizure of Correspondence) but all these cases were dismissed
by the Judge of RTC for lack supporting evidence. The defendant file a civil
case for damages anchored on alleged unlawful, malicious, oppressive, and
abusive act of the petitioner and fortunately the judge decided in favour of
the private respondents for payable charges. Petitioners appealed the RTC
decision to CA and on the other hand Torbias appeal as to the amount of
damages. However, in decision dated August 31, 1987 affirmed the RTC decision in toto. Petitioner questioned the award
of moral damages.
ISSUE: Whether or not the petitioner is
subject to exemplary damages as subject to him by the private respondents.
HELD: We
rule in the negative.
The civil liability for
non-payment of the nutri-wafer biscuits delivered by petitioner to the Edward
Ty Brothers Corporation cannot be enforced against the private respondents
because the said civil liability was not the personal liability of Ty Teck Suan
to Mansion Biscuit Corporation, rather, it was the contractual liability of
Edward Ty Brothers Corporation, of which Ty Teck Suan was president, to Mansion
Biscuit Corporation.
In the case at bench, the
acquittal of Ty Teck Suan and Siy Gui extinguished both their criminal and
civil liability as it is clear from the order acquitting them that the issuance
of the checks in question did not constitute a violation of B.P. Blg. 22. Consequently,
no civil liability arising from the alleged delict may be awarded.
Wherefore, the petition is hereby DENIED and
the decision of the CA in CA-GR CV No. 09055 is AFFIRMED.
Comments
Post a Comment